DealBuilder vs Signicat, alternative to Signicat for e-signing API and embedded signing

DealBuilder is an alternative to Signicat for companies that need e-signing, embedded signing and API-based document workflows. Both platforms support digital signing, but they are designed for different levels of complexity.

Signicat is primarily an identity and signing infrastructure platform. DealBuilder is a signing and document workflow platform that can be used both as a standalone solution and as an embedded signing component via API.

For companies evaluating alternatives to Signicat specifically for signing, DealBuilder is often considered when the requirement is digital signatures without the need for a full identity platform.

Similarities between DealBuilder and Signicat

Both DealBuilder and Signicat support digital signing workflows and API-based integrations.

Both can be used for:

• embedded e-signing
• API-based signing
• multiple signers
• audit trails and signing logs
• email and SMS delivery
• integration with CRM or SaaS platforms
• automated document workflows
• SMB and enterprise use

For companies primarily looking for a signing API, both platforms may be relevant to evaluate.

What is Signicat

Signicat is an identity and e-signature platform providing authentication, identity verification and signing services. The platform acts as an infrastructure layer for companies building identity and signing flows into their own applications.

Signicat is commonly used for:

• identity verification
• authentication and login
• eID integrations
• signing via API
• KYC workflows
• identity orchestration
• digital onboarding

Signicat supports a wide range of identity providers across multiple markets. This makes the platform suitable for organizations that require advanced identity capabilities in addition to signing.

What is DealBuilder

DealBuilder is an e-signing and document workflow platform that supports both standalone use and embedded integration. The platform combines PDF signing, document generation and API-based signing in one solution.

DealBuilder can be used for:

• PDF signing
• click-to-sign signatures
• handwritten signatures
• embedded signing via API
• document generation from templates
• sending via email and SMS
• partner integrations
• multi-tenant setups
• standalone portal usage

DealBuilder can therefore be used both as a ready-to-use signing platform and as an embedded signing engine.

DealBuilder vs Signicat, key differences

Both Signicat and DealBuilder support signing via API. The main difference is platform scope and complexity.

Signicat is typically used as an identity infrastructure platform that also includes signing.

DealBuilder is designed as a signing and document workflow platform with simpler implementation and faster setup.

For organizations that need identity orchestration, authentication or multiple eID providers, Signicat may be relevant.

For organizations that primarily need signing, DealBuilder often provides a simpler and more direct solution.

PDF signing and embedded signing

DealBuilder supports both standalone PDF signing and embedded signing via API. This allows companies to start with simple signing and later integrate signing directly into their own systems.

Typical use cases include:

• standalone document signing
• embedded signing in SaaS platforms
• partner-driven integrations
• automated contract workflows
• API-based document generation

This flexibility allows DealBuilder to be used both as a simple signing tool and as a signing infrastructure.

API and integrations

Both Signicat and DealBuilder offer API-based signing.

DealBuilder is often used as a document and signing engine in:

• CRM systems
• SaaS platforms
• internal systems
• partner solutions
• automated workflows

Typical embedded flow with DealBuilder:

• generate document in external system
• send to DealBuilder via API
• send signing link or email/SMS
• signer completes signing
• webhook returns status
• signed document returned automatically

This allows partners to implement signing without building full signing UI.

Pricing and implementation scope

When comparing DealBuilder vs Signicat, pricing and implementation scope are often key factors. Signicat is designed as a full identity platform with multiple services, which may be relevant for organizations that require identity verification, authentication and multiple eID providers.

DealBuilder focuses on e-signing and document workflows. For companies that only need signing, this often results in a simpler setup and a more predictable pricing model.

Organizations evaluating alternatives to Signicat specifically for signing often consider DealBuilder when they want:

• signing without identity platform complexity
• simpler implementation
• faster time-to-market
• lower overall cost for signing use cases
• predictable pricing for embedded signing

International use

DealBuilder is used by companies across multiple markets. The platform supports click-to-sign signatures, handwritten signatures and optional identity-based signing where required.

For companies operating across countries, DealBuilder can be used both for simple global signing and for region-specific identity providers when needed.

This makes the solution suitable for SaaS platforms, global SMB companies, enterprise organizations and partners building embedded signing into their own products.

Security and compliance

Both DealBuilder and Signicat are used for legally binding electronic signatures. DealBuilder includes audit trails, signing logs and detailed event tracking for each document.

The platform is designed for secure document handling and integration into existing workflows. Signing processes are logged and traceable, providing documentation for compliance and audit requirements.

When companies choose DealBuilder instead of Signicat

DealBuilder is often evaluated as an alternative to Signicat when companies:

• need signing but not identity platform
• want simpler API integration
• want faster time-to-market
• want lower complexity
• want ready-to-use UI
• want document generation in same platform
• want email and SMS delivery built in
• want embedded signing
• want competitive pricing
• want Nordic-focused signing

DealBuilder therefore fits organizations that need signing functionality without the full scope of an identity platform.

How DealBuilder is used in practice

DealBuilder is used by companies across SMB, enterprise and partner environments. Examples include Homely, Sigdal, DRIVE Mobility, ITX, Energima and Avonova. See more examples in customer stories:
https://www.dealbuilder.io/en/customer-stories

This shows that DealBuilder is used for PDF signing, embedded signing and full document workflows.

Summary

DealBuilder and Signicat both support API-based signing. Signicat is designed as a full identity platform with signing capabilities. DealBuilder is designed as a signing and document workflow platform.

For companies that primarily need embedded signing, document workflows and API integration, DealBuilder is an alternative to Signicat with simpler implementation, lower complexity and more predictable pricing.

You may also want to compare:

• DealBuilder vs DocuSign
• DealBuilder vs GetAccept
• DealBuilder vs Oneflow
• DealBuilder vs PandaDoc
• DealBuilder vs Penneo
• DealBuilder vs Scrive
• DealBuilder vs Visma Sign